🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."